Take Shelter (2011)

Attempting to unravel writer/director Jeff Nichols’ Take Shelter is prone to spending so much time investing the minutia that the bigger picture is lost. And there’s a lot of detail to admire in the psychological family thriller on the levels of visuals, storytelling and the nature of perception. And while there’s richness to be found from moment to moment in Take Shelter, what makes the whole film impressive is how masterful the overarching film turns out to be.

Curtis (Michael Shannon), a blue collar family man, begins experiencing dreams and waking nightmares of a coming storm. Worried over the fate of his deaf daughter Hannah (Tova Stewart) and supportive wife Samantha (Jessica Chastain), Curtis begins a series of projects that make him the talk of the town as a lunatic and begin to draw him away from his family.

It’s easy to get lost in the apocalyptic visions that Curtis experiences. They’re easily some of the most fantastic special effects of recent years, seamlessly woven into the psychological reality of the film. It’s these moments that demonstrate Take Shelter could literally go anywhere with the premise, Curtis could become lost in this world, as the viewer might be lost in the spectacle of nightmarish, but enthralling visions.

However, the film is grounded in the reality of family relationships. While Curtis’ visions are important to the film, they’re not the key element that needs to be resolved. The real issue is the heart of dealing with how this man understands his role as both a protector of this family but also someone who nurtures his family. As Curtis experiences these visions, he begins to become too much of a protector, too caught up in being cautious to an unhealthy extreme.

He slowly suffocates his family, emotionally shutting out his wife and denying his daughter from her own faithful companion out of fear. Take away the visions and all the psychological baggage that comes along with it and Take Shelter is a study of the fears of fatherhood and how it can drive a man from being a model of the good father into an obsessive control freak.

It’s Take Shelter’s interest in exploring this interpersonal reality, using the vehicle of nightmares and visions as a way to construct a fragmented portrait of the devolution of the good father. It works as both as a higher-level study of human behavior as influenced by fear and also as a tragic, emotional experience of a family’s struggle to maintain unity.

Of course, a good amount of the credit for this fascinating study must be given to Michael Shannon. His gruff softness makes him disarming, but Shannon is able to channel and contain an amount of anxiety and fear and use it to make his performance completely unsettling and mostly understated. And when the lid finally blows off, Shannon proves he’s one of the finest actors working today.

Take Shelter works on the level of visual fascination and narrative engagement, but neither element takes the film from simply a well-crafted drama into something that has a poignant point to make about the practical and internal nature of human existence. After all, few emotions are more powerful and pervasive than fear.

© 2012 James Blake Ewing

  • http://nugrosinema.wordpress.com Nugros C

    Take Shelter just stuck in my brain. I don’t think it’s perfect, but I think the way it just walks right up to the edge of being a bad horror film and then turns back toward the direction of social commentary and domestic drama is part of what makes it so great

    Shannon’s performance is pure brilliant

  • http://gravatar.com/3guys1movie 3guys1movie

    Nice take on the fatherhood angel that I had not really focused on with all the schizo visions going on. This was one of the better films of 2011 and Shannon got shafted not getting a best actor nomination.

    I hope I am not being too forward, but we have a post on our blog discussing the ending of the film ****Take Shelter Wth just happened****. I would love to hear your take on the ending of the film.

    Enjoyed checking out your blog.

    Adam

  • http://dukeandthemovies.com Quinn Bowman

    It did turn Out to be this surreal masterpiece of a movie that was just discarded to the side. I was disappointed when Michael Shannon wasn’t even recognized by the academy. I agree though, the visual effects that are able to blend right in with the rest of the film are some of the best in recent years. The ending is what truly completes the film as well. Enjoyed reading your review!

  • http://nevertooearlymoviepredictions.blogspot.com/ NeverTooEarlyMP

    I think your use of the word “suffocate” is precisely the right feel for this film, and while it is definitely the devolution of the good father, I think it’s a commentary on masculinity in general, Shannon’s character clearly goes to an extreme, but in a larger sense it is the very idea of shelter, and sheltering, that seems to really get questioned here. Great review!

    • http://cinemasights.wordpress.com/ James Blake Ewing

      Yes, it certainly does serve as a critique of a masculine extreme of protection.